Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
New nikon 16-80 f2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 471558" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>I agree. nikons lenses seem to come down in quality. the build looks horrible and cheap. it probably is made in china. china made products isnt the problem. nikons problem is QC. 7 8 or 9 blades wont really affect its performance. 9 is best but this isnt a pro level lens. not build & not specs. not in my eyes though. others might say yes. the 24-120 F/4 is no elite performer. this may be better because newer tech in coatings. but $1100 is high for this lens. id buy a used 17-55 AFS for $800 over this. I had the 17-55AFS. elite in every way. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>but IQ? ill guess well wait and see. build-same cheapy plastic. and AF speed? nikons lenses as of late are slower SWM inside. id prefer IQ over range anyday. no mfr, till now, has been able to make a zoom thats 3x plus in zoom ratio that performs really well. its decent but nothing jaw dropping. 2.5 times is the maximum zoom range where IQ is still very high. many zooms today are such short ranges. 14-24 AFS tamron 15-30VC sigma 18-35 art and now 24-35 ART also. you get limited range but IQ is not compromised. I prefer to loose some range and have IQ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 471558, member: 14443"] I agree. nikons lenses seem to come down in quality. the build looks horrible and cheap. it probably is made in china. china made products isnt the problem. nikons problem is QC. 7 8 or 9 blades wont really affect its performance. 9 is best but this isnt a pro level lens. not build & not specs. not in my eyes though. others might say yes. the 24-120 F/4 is no elite performer. this may be better because newer tech in coatings. but $1100 is high for this lens. id buy a used 17-55 AFS for $800 over this. I had the 17-55AFS. elite in every way. but IQ? ill guess well wait and see. build-same cheapy plastic. and AF speed? nikons lenses as of late are slower SWM inside. id prefer IQ over range anyday. no mfr, till now, has been able to make a zoom thats 3x plus in zoom ratio that performs really well. its decent but nothing jaw dropping. 2.5 times is the maximum zoom range where IQ is still very high. many zooms today are such short ranges. 14-24 AFS tamron 15-30VC sigma 18-35 art and now 24-35 ART also. you get limited range but IQ is not compromised. I prefer to loose some range and have IQ. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
New nikon 16-80 f2.8
Top