Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Sports
New lens recommendations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 708850" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I haven't used that particular version of the Sigma lens but did own the previous Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 OS version that I purchased new. I traded it in on a (then) new Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii. There was a world of difference in quality. </p><p></p><p>The Nikon has nicer bokeh, more contrast, and hands down was sharper than the Sigma. But since I've never used the Sigma model you mentioned, I can't offer any comparisons.</p><p></p><p>Does the Sigma connect to the dock for firmware updates? That's something you should consider. The Sigma weighs 4 pounds (based on B&H's web site) whereas the Nikon VRii weighs 3.2 pounds. If you've never used anything as heavy as either lens, then you should at least try one and see if the weight is an issue.</p><p></p><p>If you ever decide to get a teleconverter, you'd have to go with a Sigma brand for the Sigma lens or a Kenko brand that probably wouldn't be quite as sharp. If you go with the Nikon lens, then you could get a Nikon teleconverter. Down the road, have you considered what brand lenses you might want to invest in - especially longer lenses? I'm just thinking ahead about using a teleconverter with other lenses in the future should you ever decide to go that route. Good luck with whatever you choose. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 708850, member: 13196"] I haven't used that particular version of the Sigma lens but did own the previous Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 OS version that I purchased new. I traded it in on a (then) new Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRii. There was a world of difference in quality. The Nikon has nicer bokeh, more contrast, and hands down was sharper than the Sigma. But since I've never used the Sigma model you mentioned, I can't offer any comparisons. Does the Sigma connect to the dock for firmware updates? That's something you should consider. The Sigma weighs 4 pounds (based on B&H's web site) whereas the Nikon VRii weighs 3.2 pounds. If you've never used anything as heavy as either lens, then you should at least try one and see if the weight is an issue. If you ever decide to get a teleconverter, you'd have to go with a Sigma brand for the Sigma lens or a Kenko brand that probably wouldn't be quite as sharp. If you go with the Nikon lens, then you could get a Nikon teleconverter. Down the road, have you considered what brand lenses you might want to invest in - especially longer lenses? I'm just thinking ahead about using a teleconverter with other lenses in the future should you ever decide to go that route. Good luck with whatever you choose. :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Sports
New lens recommendations
Top