Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="joghurt" data-source="post: 421235" data-attributes="member: 37703">35mm is just about brilliant for most things, but while im on trips I often find that it just doesn't take the whole beauty of some places in! Too often I find myself at the 18mm thinking it's not quite wide enough! I had a look at that Tokina and it really does sound brilliant.. how does it compare against the 12-24mm previous version? And would you say it is better than sigma 10-20? (also, oh how I wish I could afford the nikkor 12-24 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> ) Ron, the 16-85mm is very tempting.. but how does it compare to the 18-55 standard lens? I read that it is very much the same thing but with more focal range.. and while I have had some good times with the 18-55, sometimes I just wish it was that little bit sharper.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="joghurt, post: 421235, member: 37703"] 35mm is just about brilliant for most things, but while im on trips I often find that it just doesn't take the whole beauty of some places in! Too often I find myself at the 18mm thinking it's not quite wide enough! I had a look at that Tokina and it really does sound brilliant.. how does it compare against the 12-24mm previous version? And would you say it is better than sigma 10-20? (also, oh how I wish I could afford the nikkor 12-24 :( ) Ron, the 16-85mm is very tempting.. but how does it compare to the 18-55 standard lens? I read that it is very much the same thing but with more focal range.. and while I have had some good times with the 18-55, sometimes I just wish it was that little bit sharper. [/QUOTE]

Verification