Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="piliff" data-source="post: 119406" data-attributes="member: 12700"><p>thanks guys, being a very basic novice at present i didint want to cause myself more problems by having another lens that will need more adjustments to achieve good results  ie, having the tamron as it was suggested having to alter certain camera settings to get results, i would rather have the nikon lens and suffer the shorter length if it will give me a better picture without too much fidling about, would the 300 tamron be very jumpy at full length in hand held? if that was the case i wouldnt be using the extra length over the nikon 200 lens?  but the tamron has the macro facility too, i guess i could use the tamron at full zoom and if its poor just go to 200 on it hance no loss at all, oh decisions to make, all very mind confusing to me, any more ideas welcome everyone , thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>