Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 65732" data-attributes="member: 4399">Lol, I went on vacation for 4 days and Mojo became an Fx snob! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />. I think size matters and it will keep Dx in a niche for awhile, within 10 years perhaps they can sqeeze a Fx sensor in a Dx frame, at that point I think we will see Dx fading. Perhaps the D600 will begin that transition. This is a big part of the debate going on in my head also, Fx/image quality vs. Dx size/speed/crop factor. I'm on the sidelines waiting to see the next two offerings in each format. I was concerned about Fx glass, but I think the new Fx 24-85 will help bridge that gap if I go Fx as a good starting lens. However, I really like the size and portability of Dx. I'm very happy with prints up to 16x24 from my Dx and so are folks that have purchased my prints. If I (they) wanted larger prints then that then I would go Fx, but I have not run into that.I'm leaning towards the next pro Dx, I feel more held back by subject material than IQ. Lol, so essentially, I'm no help with this debate <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>