Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
New body or new lens.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spb_stan" data-source="post: 667146" data-attributes="member: 43545"><p>I would approach the problem a bit differently, by seeing what the problem is you are referring to. Can you post a large file uncropped image you are objecting to noise level for. All the comments suggest improvements but are small incremental improvements. You already have 90%. The cost for 95% will likely be$2000 if equipment, or $0 if it is the technique, or 2 hours of training in post processing, depending on the actual nature of the noise. IF you are trying to freeze action with high shutter speed, you might do better by lower SS and learning the craft of panning. As you up in equipment solutions the costs and weight become almost logarithmic is increases.The sports photogs at the race track getting those publishable shots have $30k or more invested in glass. The average advanced amateur has $8-15k in lenses alone. The steps up get expensive and give marginal gains. Light or the lack of it defines what is possible with the budget or possible at all. As the light fails many pros leave and go visit the bar, their money shots all were gotten when the light was better. </p><p>Can you also describe your post processing workflow. If possible post a straight out of camera image and one of same file that you post processed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spb_stan, post: 667146, member: 43545"] I would approach the problem a bit differently, by seeing what the problem is you are referring to. Can you post a large file uncropped image you are objecting to noise level for. All the comments suggest improvements but are small incremental improvements. You already have 90%. The cost for 95% will likely be$2000 if equipment, or $0 if it is the technique, or 2 hours of training in post processing, depending on the actual nature of the noise. IF you are trying to freeze action with high shutter speed, you might do better by lower SS and learning the craft of panning. As you up in equipment solutions the costs and weight become almost logarithmic is increases.The sports photogs at the race track getting those publishable shots have $30k or more invested in glass. The average advanced amateur has $8-15k in lenses alone. The steps up get expensive and give marginal gains. Light or the lack of it defines what is possible with the budget or possible at all. As the light fails many pros leave and go visit the bar, their money shots all were gotten when the light was better. Can you also describe your post processing workflow. If possible post a straight out of camera image and one of same file that you post processed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
New body or new lens.
Top