Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 381027" data-attributes="member: 24569">I have no need for mirrorless, myself. But that's because my DSLRs do exactly what I need them to do. I guess mirrorless is the future, but I can't quite figure out why. Maybe I need to do more investigating. One thing for sure, I've yet to see a mirrorless viewfinder that satisfied me, and live view is far from ideal for many situations. IMO. My point isn't to bash mirrorless at all.Obviously it's exactly what a lot of people want. I think there are a ton of people like me, though, that still prefer SLRs, and Nikon and Canon know we exist and want to continue to provide the best SLRs they can for us. This all conjecture on my part, of course. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 381027, member: 24569"] I have no need for mirrorless, myself. But that's because my DSLRs do exactly what I need them to do. I guess mirrorless is the future, but I can't quite figure out why. Maybe I need to do more investigating. One thing for sure, I've yet to see a mirrorless viewfinder that satisfied me, and live view is far from ideal for many situations. IMO. My point isn't to bash mirrorless at all.Obviously it's exactly what a lot of people want. I think there are a ton of people like me, though, that still prefer SLRs, and Nikon and Canon know we exist and want to continue to provide the best SLRs they can for us. This all conjecture on my part, of course. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification