Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5100
New and considering lenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyNH_RIP" data-source="post: 99229" data-attributes="member: 10784"><p>brrit, thats a good question...</p><p></p><p>When I got the camera, it came with the 55-200... After using it for a while, I decided I needed a little more reach, primarily for the wildlife pics. I researched and looked at both the 70-300 and 55-300. I think the 70 was a bit better but not enough for me and my usage to warrant the extra $$$. I ended up getting a 55-300 factory re-furb for a pretty good price. When I ordered, I had every intention of selling the 55-200 (they only get about $150 and there are tons for sale. </p><p></p><p>I have kept it so far because'</p><p>A. Smaller</p><p>B. lighter</p><p></p><p>For traveling light it is better unless I know I need the reach. When I head out to shoot wildlife, planes in flight etc, I always take the 300. I still may sell the 200, I need to see where I gravitate to. I am keeping the 300 for sure, only need to decide if and how much value on the 200 vs what it will sell for.</p><p></p><p>If you are planning to shoot wildlife, I would absolutely got with the 300.. If not, and you want to save some bucks, there are plnty of 200's to be had.</p><p></p><p>Pat in NH</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyNH_RIP, post: 99229, member: 10784"] brrit, thats a good question... When I got the camera, it came with the 55-200... After using it for a while, I decided I needed a little more reach, primarily for the wildlife pics. I researched and looked at both the 70-300 and 55-300. I think the 70 was a bit better but not enough for me and my usage to warrant the extra $$$. I ended up getting a 55-300 factory re-furb for a pretty good price. When I ordered, I had every intention of selling the 55-200 (they only get about $150 and there are tons for sale. I have kept it so far because' A. Smaller B. lighter For traveling light it is better unless I know I need the reach. When I head out to shoot wildlife, planes in flight etc, I always take the 300. I still may sell the 200, I need to see where I gravitate to. I am keeping the 300 for sure, only need to decide if and how much value on the 200 vs what it will sell for. If you are planning to shoot wildlife, I would absolutely got with the 300.. If not, and you want to save some bucks, there are plnty of 200's to be had. Pat in NH [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5100
New and considering lenses
Top