Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
New 70-300 or second hand 80-200?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 660434" data-attributes="member: 15556"><p>I've owned both and I'd take the 80-200. Hands down a much better lens if you can live without VR. I owned the non VR version of the 70-300 and sold it to buy the current FX model. To me, the older model was sharper. Both versions struggle a bit at 300mm. The 80-200 is built like a tank, has better glass and has the 2.8 constant aperture. Not only is it a great tele, it's an awesome portrait lens.</p><p></p><p>Good luck.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="singlerosa_RIP, post: 660434, member: 15556"] I've owned both and I'd take the 80-200. Hands down a much better lens if you can live without VR. I owned the non VR version of the 70-300 and sold it to buy the current FX model. To me, the older model was sharper. Both versions struggle a bit at 300mm. The 80-200 is built like a tank, has better glass and has the 2.8 constant aperture. Not only is it a great tele, it's an awesome portrait lens. Good luck. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
New 70-300 or second hand 80-200?
Top
