Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
NEF vs DNG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 467575" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p><strong>Re: RAW or DNG</strong></p><p></p><p>Here's someone that dived into the DNG compression part.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://thndl.com/how-dng-compresses-raw-data-with-lossless-jpeg92.html" target="_blank">How DNG compresses raw data with lossless JPEG92 - ThNdl</a></p><p></p><p>It's fairly good but not 100% accurate and it again shows that everyone of them juggles with lossless but at the same time has their own interpretation of it. Nikon too has a reputation of lossless that in reality has always been <em>visually</em> lossless.</p><p></p><p>Still, it's not the compression part that bothers me as much as the conversion. This ridiculous concept of guarding NEFs as if they're state secrets and thus forcing everyone else to find out what to and how the data applies inevitable leads to variations and loss between formats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 467575, member: 31330"] [b]Re: RAW or DNG[/b] Here's someone that dived into the DNG compression part. [URL="http://thndl.com/how-dng-compresses-raw-data-with-lossless-jpeg92.html"]How DNG compresses raw data with lossless JPEG92 - ThNdl[/URL] It's fairly good but not 100% accurate and it again shows that everyone of them juggles with lossless but at the same time has their own interpretation of it. Nikon too has a reputation of lossless that in reality has always been [I]visually[/I] lossless. Still, it's not the compression part that bothers me as much as the conversion. This ridiculous concept of guarding NEFs as if they're state secrets and thus forcing everyone else to find out what to and how the data applies inevitable leads to variations and loss between formats. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
NEF vs DNG
Top
