Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
NEF vs DNG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felisek" data-source="post: 467571" data-attributes="member: 23887"><p><strong>Re: RAW or DNG</strong></p><p></p><p>All software I use, both for processing and viewing, accept NEF files without a hiccup. I don't see any reason to convert my images to the DNG format. The only potential reason I can understand is that in some distant future software will stop understanding the NEF format. I'm pretty sure there will be plenty of warnings before it happens and I can do the conversion later if I have to.</p><p></p><p>DNG might use lossless compression, but this is no guarantee that nothing is being lost in the process of conversion. Has anyone of you ever tried converting MS Word document into one of the open source counterparts, e.g. LibreOffice? It kind of works, but inevitably, there will be something screwed up - missing fonts, wrongly formatted tables and so on. This is why I'm deeply suspicious about NEF to DNG conversion. Something might be missing.</p><p></p><p>NEF files are my raw, unadulterated data. I want to keep it this way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felisek, post: 467571, member: 23887"] [b]Re: RAW or DNG[/b] All software I use, both for processing and viewing, accept NEF files without a hiccup. I don't see any reason to convert my images to the DNG format. The only potential reason I can understand is that in some distant future software will stop understanding the NEF format. I'm pretty sure there will be plenty of warnings before it happens and I can do the conversion later if I have to. DNG might use lossless compression, but this is no guarantee that nothing is being lost in the process of conversion. Has anyone of you ever tried converting MS Word document into one of the open source counterparts, e.g. LibreOffice? It kind of works, but inevitably, there will be something screwed up - missing fonts, wrongly formatted tables and so on. This is why I'm deeply suspicious about NEF to DNG conversion. Something might be missing. NEF files are my raw, unadulterated data. I want to keep it this way. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
NEF vs DNG
Top