Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WhiteLight" data-source="post: 229563" data-attributes="member: 9556">Well, since i started this thread, i've gone a full spin around what i need..Especially considering the fact that i presently have only Dx bodies.Though i thought i had finalised on the 70-200 (either a f/2.8 or mostly f/4), the fact that i would need to use this on a Dx body seems a little too long in terms of focal length.The space i have in mind is not large enough to accommodate the 70-200..That being said the 24-70 is expensive as hell.so this is where am at a cross road---first get the 24-70 &amp; use it on my Dx bodies.and wait.then get the 70-400 (which mostly would be the f/4 as i don't really do any action/sports) along with a Fx bodyor vice versa.if it goes the second route (of the fx body &amp; 70-200 first), i am not sure if the 24-70 would be as useful.what do you guys think??</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WhiteLight, post: 229563, member: 9556"] Well, since i started this thread, i've gone a full spin around what i need.. Especially considering the fact that i presently have only Dx bodies. Though i [I]thought [/I]i had finalised on the 70-200 (either a f/2.8 or mostly f/4), the fact that i would need to use this on a Dx body seems a little too long in terms of focal length. The space i have in mind is not large enough to accommodate the 70-200.. That being said the 24-70 is expensive as hell. so this is where am at a cross road--- first get the 24-70 & use it on my Dx bodies. and wait. then get the 70-400 (which mostly would be the f/4 as i don't really do any action/sports) along with a Fx body or vice versa. if it goes the second route (of the fx body & 70-200 first), i am not sure if the 24-70 would be as useful. what do you guys think?? [/QUOTE]

Verification