Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 174092" data-attributes="member: 15556">I have the 70-300VR and had the previous non-VR version.  Both very nice lenses and good values in the Nikon lineup.  As mentioned, it is an FX lens, so you get 105-450 coverage on a 7100.  It does require good light, though, as at 300mm you'll be at 5.6 wide open.  So, for all-purpose shooting, you might want something in a constant aperture lens.  Nikon's answer is the 17-55 2.8DX and aftermarket folks have many variations.  Unfortunately, you might spend half of what the 7100 cost you buying a used version of one of these.  But the results are worth it if you are looking to maximize those 24MP.  I've used the Nikon 17-55 on a 7000 and can only imagine how awesome it would be on a 7100.   So, as always, it comes down to what you want the lens to do.</blockquote>