Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="matt.vkm" data-source="post: 616222" data-attributes="member: 43562">Hey guys, new to the forums, I felt this was a good place to get some experienced user insight, which is exactly what I need as I've been bouncing around on choices for the past 6 months.I'm a semi-pro automotive and industrial photographer doing commercial work. I mostly focus on photography, a lot of stationary objects but sometimes motorsports and other action.I need the ability to do 4k video at 60fps, ideally more but 60 will do.I want to run the rig on a Ronin-m I have. Autofocus is something Nikon has always lacked in for video and it's quite frustrating. Sony has this down and it's amazing.I don't want to jump ship to Sony, I hate how they feel and their battery life ect, I love my Nikons. It just makes me sad Nikon isn't very good with video. The crop on the D500 for 4k video is a big issue, I want to shoot wide. I'm willing to spend some money to invest in a body, but I'm not sure which to go with. My issue is I have all Nikon gear and some nice glass. If i were to jump to say a Sony a6500 for 4k video with autofocus, i'm looking at new glass and the issue of having to learn 2 camera systems.I say a6500 because it will basically only be used when I need to do video so i'm not going with some like a A7s, if i do that, I might as well sell all my Nikon stuff and go Sony.I have looked into the GH4 with a speedbooster and Nikon lenses for 4k no crop video, but adding the expensive speedbooster, it's about 2500 and I dont get continuous non-hunting autofocus for video.a6500 is looking pretty good, I could probably handle getting 1 decent quality, wide lens for it and stop at that, but it seems like a waste.I want a Nikon that can handle high quality video. Sadly no Nikon I know of has continuous non-crappy video autofocus.Maybe I should have went Canon?Help please!Thanks,Matt</blockquote>

Verification