Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="thegaffney" data-source="post: 404735" data-attributes="member: 12353">I want to buy a 24 2.8 for doing night photos, and maybe even use it for my automotive photography if the quality is good.I don't mind if its manual focus, and I don't mind having to figure out the exposure myself.So the question is, which one of the models of the 24 2.8 would be OK for me?I see the AF-D lenses are a bit more pricy than the non-D lens, would I need the D part?Like I was looking at this one and it seems nice? And its under $200 so I like that about it too.[ATTACH]134112[/ATTACH]But then there are older ones for about $150[ATTACH=full]134113[/ATTACH]and A sigma one for even less than that[ATTACH=full]134114[/ATTACH]If the difference in the Nikon ones is only the advantages of the autofocus or metering Id rater get the cheaper one since I would be using it manually all the time.Does anyone know about the sigma one?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="thegaffney, post: 404735, member: 12353"] I want to buy a 24 2.8 for doing night photos, and maybe even use it for my automotive photography if the quality is good. I don't mind if its manual focus, and I don't mind having to figure out the exposure myself. So the question is, which one of the models of the 24 2.8 would be OK for me? I see the AF-D lenses are a bit more pricy than the non-D lens, would I need the D part? Like I was looking at this one and it seems nice? And its under $200 so I like that about it too. [ATTACH=CONFIG]134112._xfImport[/ATTACH] But then there are older ones for about $150 [ATTACH type="full"]134113._xfImport[/ATTACH] and A sigma one for even less than that [ATTACH type="full"]134114._xfImport[/ATTACH] If the difference in the Nikon ones is only the advantages of the autofocus or metering Id rater get the cheaper one since I would be using it manually all the time. Does anyone know about the sigma one? [/QUOTE]

Verification