Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 661983" data-attributes="member: 13196">I agree with Marcel on this. In the past I've taken photos during Worship services, and although there are lights, it isn't overly bright. I remember using my D610, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8, and a 1.4x teleconverter. The lowest working aperture was f/4. There were times my D610 couldn't AF due to the amount of light and a lack of contrast. You won't want to miss shots by not having fast enough glass.And link that Fish posted with the Tamron 70-200mm lens looks like it has VC (their version of vibration reduction). That means you can hand hold the lens at slower shutter speeds than the lens you posted. The one he posted is definitely one you should consider.Good luck with whatever you choose! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 661983, member: 13196"] I agree with Marcel on this. In the past I've taken photos during Worship services, and although there are lights, it isn't overly bright. I remember using my D610, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8, and a 1.4x teleconverter. The lowest working aperture was f/4. There were times my D610 couldn't AF due to the amount of light and a lack of contrast. You won't want to miss shots by not having fast enough glass. And link that Fish posted with the Tamron 70-200mm lens looks like it has VC (their version of vibration reduction). That means you can hand hold the lens at slower shutter speeds than the lens you posted. The one he posted is definitely one you should consider. Good luck with whatever you choose! :) [/QUOTE]

Verification