Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Nature photography and the 70-200 f 2.8 .....not fealing the love...is it me?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 534696" data-attributes="member: 24569"><p>I know many people use the 70-200 for things like portrait, wedding and indoor sports photography, although the f/2.8 would probably be preferred for the extra f-stop. Seems like the 24-120 and 150-600 would have you well covered for the types of photography you are doing. There is no single correct answer. Everyone needs to match their tools with the job they want to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 534696, member: 24569"] I know many people use the 70-200 for things like portrait, wedding and indoor sports photography, although the f/2.8 would probably be preferred for the extra f-stop. Seems like the 24-120 and 150-600 would have you well covered for the types of photography you are doing. There is no single correct answer. Everyone needs to match their tools with the job they want to do. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Nature photography and the 70-200 f 2.8 .....not fealing the love...is it me?
Top
