Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 61089" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>I agree with your point that RAW can NOT fix anything and that a bad photo will remain a bad photo after processing too. But, in order to make great pictures, I think you have to take a great amount of pictures. Unless you would be a art genius, there is a learning process that involves knowing how different light will affect the result, how composition can make a picture more attractive, where to install the camera to get the best point of view in a landscape. And there is no other way than trial and error to find out what you can get on a picture. I guess what I'm trying to say is that if you only take great pictures by saving the amounts of clicks you do, you might not get the even better picture because at the time you thought it was not worth it.</p><p></p><p>The mistake a lot of people make is that they forget the picture will be in 2 dimensions. They think that what they see as their point of interest (where their eyes focus) will be very evident on the final picture. And this is not very often the case since they forgot about all the other elements in the picture that will fight to get your eyes attention.</p><p></p><p>So in a way I agree with you, but think the best way to learn is to take pictures and if you find something interesting, do different angles, different settings until you know exactly how to use the tools you have to get the final photo done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 61089, member: 3903"] I agree with your point that RAW can NOT fix anything and that a bad photo will remain a bad photo after processing too. But, in order to make great pictures, I think you have to take a great amount of pictures. Unless you would be a art genius, there is a learning process that involves knowing how different light will affect the result, how composition can make a picture more attractive, where to install the camera to get the best point of view in a landscape. And there is no other way than trial and error to find out what you can get on a picture. I guess what I'm trying to say is that if you only take great pictures by saving the amounts of clicks you do, you might not get the even better picture because at the time you thought it was not worth it. The mistake a lot of people make is that they forget the picture will be in 2 dimensions. They think that what they see as their point of interest (where their eyes focus) will be very evident on the final picture. And this is not very often the case since they forgot about all the other elements in the picture that will fight to get your eyes attention. So in a way I agree with you, but think the best way to learn is to take pictures and if you find something interesting, do different angles, different settings until you know exactly how to use the tools you have to get the final photo done. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
Top