Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="airman85b" data-source="post: 61062" data-attributes="member: 9072"><p>I should of put it this way since this is my thinking. </p><p></p><p>After argueing about editing or not we got into Take vs Make photos.</p><p></p><p>I was out numbered at work about this. My co-workers think having a DSLR is so you can shoot in RAW and edit more. Which I didn't have a probelm with but I think the point to owning a DLSR is so that your able to take good photos to begin with. Not take jacked up photos and be able to make them good later which is ok to but we should try to take good photos to begin with. </p><p></p><p> I'm still new to the DSLR world and came into it because of all the things(change settings, change lenses, etc etc) you can do to take a good photo not because now I can shoot in RAW and be able to edit more. I thought being in the DSLR world a lot of people would look foward to finding and taking good photos. This wasnt to complain about editing it was my view that we should try to take good photos to begin with, not just click and pray. I'm learning everyday how to take better photos, but it makes me angry when my co-workers tell it doesn't matter how you take photos because if you shoot in RAW you can fix anything. Thats the whole point of having an SLR is not to point and shoot but to take time and find the shot you want. This wasn't really about natural or editing but about learning your camera and takeing the best photo you can. This is just my logic maybe all of you may think I'm stupid or crazy but this is just what I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="airman85b, post: 61062, member: 9072"] I should of put it this way since this is my thinking. After argueing about editing or not we got into Take vs Make photos. I was out numbered at work about this. My co-workers think having a DSLR is so you can shoot in RAW and edit more. Which I didn't have a probelm with but I think the point to owning a DLSR is so that your able to take good photos to begin with. Not take jacked up photos and be able to make them good later which is ok to but we should try to take good photos to begin with. I'm still new to the DSLR world and came into it because of all the things(change settings, change lenses, etc etc) you can do to take a good photo not because now I can shoot in RAW and be able to edit more. I thought being in the DSLR world a lot of people would look foward to finding and taking good photos. This wasnt to complain about editing it was my view that we should try to take good photos to begin with, not just click and pray. I'm learning everyday how to take better photos, but it makes me angry when my co-workers tell it doesn't matter how you take photos because if you shoot in RAW you can fix anything. Thats the whole point of having an SLR is not to point and shoot but to take time and find the shot you want. This wasn't really about natural or editing but about learning your camera and takeing the best photo you can. This is just my logic maybe all of you may think I'm stupid or crazy but this is just what I think. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
Top