Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bluenoser" data-source="post: 61039" data-attributes="member: 6351"><p>He sounds like that girl Seinfeld dated in a particularly funny episode when she stubbornly refused to eat a piece of his apple pie (she just kept shaking her head when he asked her about the pie) and more confoundingly refused to give him a reason even though she professed to like apple pie. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Did the police get involved? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Gee...he sure sounds like a barrel of laughs! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you have to edit good photos to make them great.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I prefer to think of it as being lazy vs. not-being lazy. The term "natural" usually imparts some level of virtue to what it's describing - I'm not sure it's virtuous to be lazy. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are probably in the minority amongst people that join online photography sites but by far, more people out there just buy a camera (point and shoot, DSLR, etc.), shoot JPEG and are happy (ignorance is truly bliss <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />) So being in the latter population, you are easily in the majority (although whenever I find myself in that situation it makes me question my decisions as I find the majority of people are usually way off base about most things!)</p><p></p><p>There is nothing inherently wrong about shooting JPEG and being satisfied with the results. However in most cases I have come across - whether shooting JPEG or RAW - doing some amount of editing will improve the image. </p><p></p><p>Your co-worker - IMHO - has taken things to a bizarre extreme and I feel his issues are less with processing vs. not processing and have more to do with taking his meds vs. not taking his meds. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bluenoser, post: 61039, member: 6351"] He sounds like that girl Seinfeld dated in a particularly funny episode when she stubbornly refused to eat a piece of his apple pie (she just kept shaking her head when he asked her about the pie) and more confoundingly refused to give him a reason even though she professed to like apple pie. :) Did the police get involved? :) Gee...he sure sounds like a barrel of laughs! :) I think you have to edit good photos to make them great. I prefer to think of it as being lazy vs. not-being lazy. The term "natural" usually imparts some level of virtue to what it's describing - I'm not sure it's virtuous to be lazy. :) You are probably in the minority amongst people that join online photography sites but by far, more people out there just buy a camera (point and shoot, DSLR, etc.), shoot JPEG and are happy (ignorance is truly bliss :)) So being in the latter population, you are easily in the majority (although whenever I find myself in that situation it makes me question my decisions as I find the majority of people are usually way off base about most things!) There is nothing inherently wrong about shooting JPEG and being satisfied with the results. However in most cases I have come across - whether shooting JPEG or RAW - doing some amount of editing will improve the image. Your co-worker - IMHO - has taken things to a bizarre extreme and I feel his issues are less with processing vs. not processing and have more to do with taking his meds vs. not taking his meds. ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Natural or Editor?
Top