Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
National Geographic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 198669" data-attributes="member: 1573"><p>I agree with all of you and am disappointed with NatG. I hoped that they would have held to their standard of professional quality photos, but sadly, like everything else in this world, it's all about money.</p><p></p><p>I refuse to participate in any of these "global. free photo thingies" . . . </p><p></p><p>For the dedicated, serious photographers, it's even more important to work on developing a style that stands out among the masses. EVENTUALLY, people will be sick of look at mediocrity . . . the masses of junk on Flickr . . .I know I am, . . . and something about your photo will stand out for somebody.</p><p></p><p>Somebody in another thread also mentioned the "ethics' think in photojournalism. These publications using 'free' photos have no guarantee that a "fabulous" photo hasn't been photoshopped . . . honor and ethics mean little today compared to money and fame.</p><p></p><p></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 198669, member: 1573"] I agree with all of you and am disappointed with NatG. I hoped that they would have held to their standard of professional quality photos, but sadly, like everything else in this world, it's all about money. I refuse to participate in any of these "global. free photo thingies" . . . For the dedicated, serious photographers, it's even more important to work on developing a style that stands out among the masses. EVENTUALLY, people will be sick of look at mediocrity . . . the masses of junk on Flickr . . .I know I am, . . . and something about your photo will stand out for somebody. Somebody in another thread also mentioned the "ethics' think in photojournalism. These publications using 'free' photos have no guarantee that a "fabulous" photo hasn't been photoshopped . . . honor and ethics mean little today compared to money and fame. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
National Geographic
Top
