Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
My new D3300
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 295771" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>Another new thing learnt. Why you should not use very high capacity SD cards.</p><p></p><p>In my thought process the bigger the card capacity the better. Little did I realise the pit falls of "Too Large" a capacity. I bought a 32GB 45mbps card as I felt that the 4GB class 4 card was too small and too slow. So I am using the 32 GB card. Here are the down sides</p><p>. When importing the images, once the number of images crosses 200, the listing of directory takes time. Today with over 820 (about 16GB) images in my car the listing took five minutes. With less than 200 images it is practically instantaneous.</p><p>. The camera has become slow. It crawls. Where as in general there was no time lag in shutter actuation, once the number of images crossed 400 it slowed down and today with 700+ imanges on the card the shutter would actuated after more than 3 seconds after pressing the button.</p><p></p><p>In short, a 16GB or better an 8GB card would be optimum size. I have a feeling that Nikon has crippled the D3300 so that a professional would go for a more expensive body. Here is what I feel has been deliberately crippled</p><p>. Though the processor is same as that in D5300, the response is slow</p><p>. The ISO 100 and ISO 200 have same DR. The DR at ISO 100 should have been same as in D5300 and D7100.</p><p>. Non CPU lenses do not meter, while in higher end bodies they do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 295771, member: 16090"] Another new thing learnt. Why you should not use very high capacity SD cards. In my thought process the bigger the card capacity the better. Little did I realise the pit falls of "Too Large" a capacity. I bought a 32GB 45mbps card as I felt that the 4GB class 4 card was too small and too slow. So I am using the 32 GB card. Here are the down sides . When importing the images, once the number of images crosses 200, the listing of directory takes time. Today with over 820 (about 16GB) images in my car the listing took five minutes. With less than 200 images it is practically instantaneous. . The camera has become slow. It crawls. Where as in general there was no time lag in shutter actuation, once the number of images crossed 400 it slowed down and today with 700+ imanges on the card the shutter would actuated after more than 3 seconds after pressing the button. In short, a 16GB or better an 8GB card would be optimum size. I have a feeling that Nikon has crippled the D3300 so that a professional would go for a more expensive body. Here is what I feel has been deliberately crippled . Though the processor is same as that in D5300, the response is slow . The ISO 100 and ISO 200 have same DR. The DR at ISO 100 should have been same as in D5300 and D7100. . Non CPU lenses do not meter, while in higher end bodies they do. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
My new D3300
Top