Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 484480" data-attributes="member: 15675">As you might have noticed I'm trying to convince people not to buy. This is part of my own GAS treatement.1) You might be able to do enough with what you have2) You might be able to have a different approach3) You might be able to exclude subjects (for which you need the new equipment)On my own decision (I have a lot of material, my approach can improve and I really want to photograph skittish small animals):1) At this moment with a 70-300 + 500 + tc 1.4 I find it sufficient to cover most situations.2) However I will go to the 300 f4E (portability and quality together) + 600mm f4 to really spend more time on photography, but this is for the future.3) More flexible 150-600mm or 200-500mm, seems still limited in portability and not optimal quality for really far reach (vs 600mm + TC1.4). Photography forums are full with people that are mad when it concerns spending on photography and many are addicts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 484480, member: 15675"] As you might have noticed I'm trying to convince people not to buy. This is part of my own GAS treatement. 1) You might be able to do enough with what you have 2) You might be able to have a different approach 3) You might be able to exclude subjects (for which you need the new equipment) On my own decision (I have a lot of material, my approach can improve and I really want to photograph skittish small animals): 1) At this moment with a 70-300 + 500 + tc 1.4 I find it sufficient to cover most situations. 2) However I will go to the 300 f4E (portability and quality together) + 600mm f4 to really spend more time on photography, but this is for the future. 3) More flexible 150-600mm or 200-500mm, seems still limited in portability and not optimal quality for really far reach (vs 600mm + TC1.4). Photography forums are full with people that are mad when it concerns spending on photography and many are addicts. [/QUOTE]

Verification