Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
My Days With Nikon Could Be Numbered
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 519064" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I know you are quite gifted when it comes to post processing and most likely any differences between Nikon vs. Canon files won't make you bat an eyelash. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>I did an online search to see if there were any comparisons between Nikon and Canon RAW files, and apparently there are. After you've had a chance to play around with the Canon files, it will be interesting to hear your observations between post processing them. According to the article, Canon RAW files have a higher Auto White Balance temp than Nikon RAW files, and there are other differences as well. </p><p></p><p>I imagine a lot of people would be interested in your findings if you choose to share them--especially for those who switched to Nikon from Canon. Many don't seem to be able to identify <strong><em>why</em></strong> Nikon files are so different than Canon files (I'm specifically talking about RAW files).</p><p></p><p>Quote from the article:</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.oopoomoo.com/2012/03/personal-style-is-your-camera-determining-yours/" target="_blank">A Comparison of Canon and Nikon files and the Impact on Personal Style | oopoomoo : create, inspire, educate</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 519064, member: 13196"] I know you are quite gifted when it comes to post processing and most likely any differences between Nikon vs. Canon files won't make you bat an eyelash. ;) I did an online search to see if there were any comparisons between Nikon and Canon RAW files, and apparently there are. After you've had a chance to play around with the Canon files, it will be interesting to hear your observations between post processing them. According to the article, Canon RAW files have a higher Auto White Balance temp than Nikon RAW files, and there are other differences as well. I imagine a lot of people would be interested in your findings if you choose to share them--especially for those who switched to Nikon from Canon. Many don't seem to be able to identify [B][I]why[/I][/B] Nikon files are so different than Canon files (I'm specifically talking about RAW files). Quote from the article: [url=http://www.oopoomoo.com/2012/03/personal-style-is-your-camera-determining-yours/]A Comparison of Canon and Nikon files and the Impact on Personal Style | oopoomoo : create, inspire, educate[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
My Days With Nikon Could Be Numbered
Top
