Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wakefieldowl" data-source="post: 781916" data-attributes="member: 46629">Hi everyone. Thanks for your kind replies. I did consider depth of field and changing the aperture. I did try doing that, but the room was dimly lit, so when i upped the aperture from 2.4 to something like 8, it came out totally dark. I appreciate that i can change the speed and ISO, so adjusted accordingley, but had to endure a lot of noise. I was only doing practice shots, so the results weren't important. However it did make me wonder, how i would achieve satisfactory results in that situation. I presume the answer would be to add lighting.The extra info from Hark and Peter is fantastic and much appreciated.However is there a way of changing the focus from just one point? I have tried putting it to 9 and 21 points, yet it still only focusses (spelling?) On one thing in both the viewfinder and the results.Thanks again for your help</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wakefieldowl, post: 781916, member: 46629"] Hi everyone. Thanks for your kind replies. I did consider depth of field and changing the aperture. I did try doing that, but the room was dimly lit, so when i upped the aperture from 2.4 to something like 8, it came out totally dark. I appreciate that i can change the speed and ISO, so adjusted accordingley, but had to endure a lot of noise. I was only doing practice shots, so the results weren't important. However it did make me wonder, how i would achieve satisfactory results in that situation. I presume the answer would be to add lighting. The extra info from Hark and Peter is fantastic and much appreciated. However is there a way of changing the focus from just one point? I have tried putting it to 9 and 21 points, yet it still only focusses (spelling?) On one thing in both the viewfinder and the results. Thanks again for your help [/QUOTE]

Verification