Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 143714" data-attributes="member: 8705">I went FX at the end of last year &quot;because that's obviously where you will want to be&quot;. Now some time has passed I'm more of he view that each has it's place. I sometimes grab the D300s over the D800 as its more convenient and even better at some things. I also think the high ISO noise thing is becoming less of a gap between DX and FX.The D600 takes stunning images, in my opinion as good to my eye as my 800. I got the latter for ergonomics not IQ. Also the 600 in crop mode is less output than my D300, whereas the 800 is more.If you shoot sports or wildlife a lot I think DX is a better choice unless you can afford big expensive glass to fill your FX viewfinder.If you got a 7100 it would last you a good few years, unless you had buffer size issues in the short term.I think what I'm saying is not to assume that one is hands down better than the other, each has its place.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 143714, member: 8705"] I went FX at the end of last year "because that's obviously where you will want to be". Now some time has passed I'm more of he view that each has it's place. I sometimes grab the D300s over the D800 as its more convenient and even better at some things. I also think the high ISO noise thing is becoming less of a gap between DX and FX. The D600 takes stunning images, in my opinion as good to my eye as my 800. I got the latter for ergonomics not IQ. Also the 600 in crop mode is less output than my D300, whereas the 800 is more. If you shoot sports or wildlife a lot I think DX is a better choice unless you can afford big expensive glass to fill your FX viewfinder. If you got a 7100 it would last you a good few years, unless you had buffer size issues in the short term. I think what I'm saying is not to assume that one is hands down better than the other, each has its place. [/QUOTE]

Verification