Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dave_W" data-source="post: 284958" data-attributes="member: 9521"><p>I disagree. "Better" glass does not automatically equal to "better" images. "Better", being a strictly subjective word, does not necessarily depend upon crispness or lower ISO. In order to answer the OP's question, many of us choose to focus less on the glass (as we all know, world class images can come from the cheapest glass) and instead focus on the elements that actually make a "better" image. In fact, the sole entity "making" the image is the photographer, not the photographers equipment. So the answer to the OP's question, if read only for face value is "no", expensive glass does not automatically make better images.</p></blockquote><p></p>