Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
More detail
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 480516" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>Yes DX sensor has higher pixel density, so you cram more information per square mm! If your images are smaller than the DX sensor size - 24 x 15, then DX will have more details than FX.</p><p></p><p>I always use flash with my D3300 for close up work. Does wonders to IQ, and you can use F/44 with no qualm. With my 105mm F2.8 AIS, at max magnification (1:1.2?) the SB800 needs only 1/2 power at F/44.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 480516, member: 16090"] Yes DX sensor has higher pixel density, so you cram more information per square mm! If your images are smaller than the DX sensor size - 24 x 15, then DX will have more details than FX. I always use flash with my D3300 for close up work. Does wonders to IQ, and you can use F/44 with no qualm. With my 105mm F2.8 AIS, at max magnification (1:1.2?) the SB800 needs only 1/2 power at F/44. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
More detail
Top
