Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
More detail
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 480480" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>Personally I think the crop difference in macro only plays a role when you shoot at 1:1 while the shot at that magnification fills the whole sensor on the DX. If that's the shot you need, that's also when the pixel advantage of the DX comes into play. But they need to be tiny bugs to allow such and the moment you have to move backward to get more framed, the FX starts to catch up since it already has more framed on the sensor. It doesn't take much before the D810 is identical or even outperforms the D3200 at the level of pixels used.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 480480, member: 31330"] Personally I think the crop difference in macro only plays a role when you shoot at 1:1 while the shot at that magnification fills the whole sensor on the DX. If that's the shot you need, that's also when the pixel advantage of the DX comes into play. But they need to be tiny bugs to allow such and the moment you have to move backward to get more framed, the FX starts to catch up since it already has more framed on the sensor. It doesn't take much before the D810 is identical or even outperforms the D3200 at the level of pixels used. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
More detail
Top