Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BF Hammer" data-source="post: 814441" data-attributes="member: 48483">Supernova actually posted a link to an album on Imgur. What you see in the first post is a badly overexposed image, but some of the others are closer to correct. But they either are not focused or have motion blur from not using the self-timer to delay the shutter release. Maybe both. He is using a nice, fast shutter speed so I think the focus was just lost in the sequence. A star is the best thing to find infinity focus on. Adjust it so it becomes as tight of a point of light as possible, it will be a fuzzy ball when out of focus.I'll post one of the later shots in his album.<img src="https://imgur.com/yxm8Ciw.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />ps: If this photo had to be done with autoexposure, it could be done better with spot-metering instead of matrix. With focal point on the moon the autoexposure puts more emphasis on measuring the bright thing at that point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BF Hammer, post: 814441, member: 48483"] Supernova actually posted a link to an album on Imgur. What you see in the first post is a badly overexposed image, but some of the others are closer to correct. But they either are not focused or have motion blur from not using the self-timer to delay the shutter release. Maybe both. He is using a nice, fast shutter speed so I think the focus was just lost in the sequence. A star is the best thing to find infinity focus on. Adjust it so it becomes as tight of a point of light as possible, it will be a fuzzy ball when out of focus. I'll post one of the later shots in his album. [IMG]https://imgur.com/yxm8Ciw.jpg[/IMG] ps: If this photo had to be done with autoexposure, it could be done better with spot-metering instead of matrix. With focal point on the moon the autoexposure puts more emphasis on measuring the bright thing at that point. [/QUOTE]

Verification