Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 378619" data-attributes="member: 12496">Probably not a big difference, but a difference.&nbsp; Probably depends on the monitor quality, and if IPS or TN, etc.&nbsp; But the cost (video only, skipping printer) seems small compared to about any other camera gadget, and it probably does more.&nbsp; The ease of mind seems worth it.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp;&nbsp; The software shows at least a dozen different tones of each of red, green, blue, gray on the screen, and the sensor tool reads the result, and adjusts things to actually show the actual expected value. That's something.&nbsp;Also, for an in-the-field goal, compare your cameras rear LCD screen with the same image on the calibrated monitor, and adjust camera LCD brightness (-1) to match it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 378619, member: 12496"] Probably not a big difference, but a difference. Probably depends on the monitor quality, and if IPS or TN, etc. But the cost (video only, skipping printer) seems small compared to about any other camera gadget, and it probably does more. The ease of mind seems worth it. :) The software shows at least a dozen different tones of each of red, green, blue, gray on the screen, and the sensor tool reads the result, and adjusts things to actually show the actual expected value. That's something. Also, for an in-the-field goal, compare your cameras rear LCD screen with the same image on the calibrated monitor, and adjust camera LCD brightness (-1) to match it. [/QUOTE]

Verification