Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 437953" data-attributes="member: 12855">Honestly, mutual agreements ought to be for equivalent use. You use her images to seek clients, she uses them to seek gigs. If either of you start profiting directly from the images, then it should be a split or termination of unjust usage on the side at fault. It sounds like your friend needs to learn this contract and usage lesson far more than you do, because it CAN get her in trouble and get her some rap.Lastly, since you asked about details in this section of the forum - try not to hurt the industry for others by not really caring too much about such situations. I say this to a good few friends who shoot because by doing work for free and then letting clients profit from it just like that, it sets new invisible standards to all the clients and related figures. &quot;Go work with that photog because you'll ultimately profit for free instead of others who'll want a cut for the work.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 437953, member: 12855"] Honestly, mutual agreements ought to be for equivalent use. You use her images to seek clients, she uses them to seek gigs. If either of you start profiting directly from the images, then it should be a split or termination of unjust usage on the side at fault. It sounds like your friend needs to learn this contract and usage lesson far more than you do, because it CAN get her in trouble and get her some rap. Lastly, since you asked about details in this section of the forum - try not to hurt the industry for others by not really caring too much about such situations. I say this to a good few friends who shoot because by doing work for free and then letting clients profit from it just like that, it sets new invisible standards to all the clients and related figures. "Go work with that photog because you'll ultimately profit for free instead of others who'll want a cut for the work." [/QUOTE]

Verification