Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Moab Man's Magnified Macro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moab Man" data-source="post: 435138" data-attributes="member: 11881"><p>@<a href="http://nikonites.com/member-28936-chayelle.html" target="_blank">Chayelle</a> thanks.</p><p></p><p>There is definitely a huge technique learning curve to the Raynox. After 2-3 days of use I have developed a much smoother and smaller advance of bringing the lens closer to the subject thus bringing the bug into focus. Starting out, and accustom to traditional macro bug photography, my prior to a Raynox technique seems more like a sledgehammer approach where now my approach is more the precision of a scalpel. </p><p></p><p>My thoughts for everyone... Raynox, DX or FX</p><p>I have been bouncing back and forth between the two sensor sizes. The decision is not final, but I seem to be getting better images out of my FX than the DX. My suspicion is that the increased "magnification" of shooting on a DX seems to be (my theory) blowing apart the image and is not as sharp. What I need to do is try shooting from the tripod at a fixed object and try to rule out the human factor or if my theory is what seems to be occurring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moab Man, post: 435138, member: 11881"] @[URL="http://nikonites.com/member-28936-chayelle.html"]Chayelle[/URL] thanks. There is definitely a huge technique learning curve to the Raynox. After 2-3 days of use I have developed a much smoother and smaller advance of bringing the lens closer to the subject thus bringing the bug into focus. Starting out, and accustom to traditional macro bug photography, my prior to a Raynox technique seems more like a sledgehammer approach where now my approach is more the precision of a scalpel. My thoughts for everyone... Raynox, DX or FX I have been bouncing back and forth between the two sensor sizes. The decision is not final, but I seem to be getting better images out of my FX than the DX. My suspicion is that the increased "magnification" of shooting on a DX seems to be (my theory) blowing apart the image and is not as sharp. What I need to do is try shooting from the tripod at a fixed object and try to rule out the human factor or if my theory is what seems to be occurring. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Moab Man's Magnified Macro
Top