Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Moab Man" data-source="post: 321187" data-attributes="member: 11881">[USER=12948]@Krs_2007[/USER] I'm ok with suck. It's a funny story. Many years ago when I first started dipping my toes into photography for real I had an image in Moab, Utah that I was really quite proud of. This was the pro I was learning under. In a moment of engaged mouth before brain he responded with, "That photos really sucks." Looking back I agree, that photo really sucked. But it became my drive to improve, and under his tutelage I grew and developed. He was not trying to be mean or harsh, the mouth simply engaged before the brain could sugar coat it.  On the D7100, I love this camera and use it more than my D600 as it is more versatile. 1. The sensor picks up more detail.2. "Reach" of the crop sensor means I don't have to pay huge amounts to get an FX lens that will achieve the same reach as the 7100's cropped distance zoom. And my FX lenses are extended on the D7100.3. Cropping down on the D7100 gives me many more megapixels to work with because my D600 and 7100 have the same count but they are much tighter on the 7100 giving me more left over after cropping.4. Going between the 600 & 7100 is seamless in layout.5. DOF is larger and makes shooting macro easier when I'm trying to pull in more of a tiny subject.For the above reasons I use it more than the D600. My D600 is my go to when I have a portrait shoot, Milky Way, low light, or a high ISO need. So I guess I would say the D7100 is my go to camera with the D600 stepping in where the D7100 starts to falter. In my opinion I don't think you can find a better pairing than the D6xx and the D7100.</blockquote>

Verification