Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Microsoft office picture manager
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 499720" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Macromedia MX was designed for web design and content distribution and while it has image editing capabilities it's not exactly what I would call a go-to bitmap/raster image editor. When Macromedia was acquired by Adobe those applications were integrated into Adobe's Creative Suite. Creative Suite is available through Adobe's Creative Cloud but Creative Cloud itself is a distribution method and bears no resemblance to Macromedia MX which again is/was a web-content creation suite. Is Macromedia MX 2004 outdated? In a word, yes. I'm sure it can still get the job done but there are better options, especially if you want to focus on digital photography.</p><p></p><p>If you want to get up to date with your bitmap image/RAW file editing I suggest you look into either Adobe Photoshop, or Adobe Lightroom. Lightroom is still available as a stand-alone application if you don't like the idea of a Creative Cloud subscription. Lesser in price would be applications from Corel, such as Paintshop Pro or something from ACDSee, such as ACDSee Pro. If you want something that's totally free, Nikon's View NX-D would be a good choice but asking if the Nikon application(s) are superior to Macromedia MX 2004 is an apples-to-oranges comparison. </p><p></p><p>If you really want to continue using Picture Manager you could try installing the <a href="http://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/download/sw/30.html" target="_blank">Nikon .NEF Codec</a> and see if that helps. </p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 499720, member: 13090"] Macromedia MX was designed for web design and content distribution and while it has image editing capabilities it's not exactly what I would call a go-to bitmap/raster image editor. When Macromedia was acquired by Adobe those applications were integrated into Adobe's Creative Suite. Creative Suite is available through Adobe's Creative Cloud but Creative Cloud itself is a distribution method and bears no resemblance to Macromedia MX which again is/was a web-content creation suite. Is Macromedia MX 2004 outdated? In a word, yes. I'm sure it can still get the job done but there are better options, especially if you want to focus on digital photography. If you want to get up to date with your bitmap image/RAW file editing I suggest you look into either Adobe Photoshop, or Adobe Lightroom. Lightroom is still available as a stand-alone application if you don't like the idea of a Creative Cloud subscription. Lesser in price would be applications from Corel, such as Paintshop Pro or something from ACDSee, such as ACDSee Pro. If you want something that's totally free, Nikon's View NX-D would be a good choice but asking if the Nikon application(s) are superior to Macromedia MX 2004 is an apples-to-oranges comparison. If you really want to continue using Picture Manager you could try installing the [url=http://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/download/sw/30.html]Nikon .NEF Codec[/url] and see if that helps. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Microsoft office picture manager
Top
