Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Eyelight" data-source="post: 304172" data-attributes="member: 24753">I do not disagree, simply because I think I failed to properly illustrate what I was imagining out here on the edge (or over as the case may be).I'm still looking at a small pixel and what happens when it moves and I think most are seeing MM's.&nbsp; Not saying it is a bad thing to have small pixels. I myself have small pixels.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />It seems we are aware that camera movement destroys detail. Doesn't it make sense that if we destroy the same square MM's of detail, a 24.2MP sensor suffers more resolution loss than a 12MP of the same size.&nbsp; If it doesn't then [USER=22693]@Blacktop[/USER] hit the nail on the head and a 1 pixel sensor would be the way to go.:chuncky:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eyelight, post: 304172, member: 24753"] I do not disagree, simply because I think I failed to properly illustrate what I was imagining out here on the edge (or over as the case may be). I'm still looking at a small pixel and what happens when it moves and I think most are seeing MM's. Not saying it is a bad thing to have small pixels. I myself have small pixels.:) It seems we are aware that camera movement destroys detail. Doesn't it make sense that if we destroy the same square MM's of detail, a 24.2MP sensor suffers more resolution loss than a 12MP of the same size. If it doesn't then [USER=22693]@Blacktop[/USER] hit the nail on the head and a 1 pixel sensor would be the way to go.:chuncky: [/QUOTE]

Verification