Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Megapixels versus Earthquakes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 303924" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>My notion is that maybe you passed the edge. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Do you have any actual problem? More pixels (and the larger 4x5 camera too) do offer greater resolution (the 4x5 because it is enlarged only a fraction as much - but had it been 4x5 digital, it would have needed many times more megapixels to be adequate). </p><p></p><p>Sure, greater resolution could show blur better (shows all things better), but less resolution is not a solution for blur. You see less either way. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> If it is blurred, it is blurred. Resolution to see it is a good thing.</p><p></p><p>My reaction to a 36 mp D800 was the incredible resolution it offers (I was comparing to 12 mp DX, not to 24 mp DX). Resolution is a plus, not a minus. I don't notice any issue hand holding it, that's same as it always was. I think forget about any increased concerns, just observe normal good practice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 303924, member: 12496"] My notion is that maybe you passed the edge. :) Do you have any actual problem? More pixels (and the larger 4x5 camera too) do offer greater resolution (the 4x5 because it is enlarged only a fraction as much - but had it been 4x5 digital, it would have needed many times more megapixels to be adequate). Sure, greater resolution could show blur better (shows all things better), but less resolution is not a solution for blur. You see less either way. :) If it is blurred, it is blurred. Resolution to see it is a good thing. My reaction to a 36 mp D800 was the incredible resolution it offers (I was comparing to 12 mp DX, not to 24 mp DX). Resolution is a plus, not a minus. I don't notice any issue hand holding it, that's same as it always was. I think forget about any increased concerns, just observe normal good practice. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Megapixels versus Earthquakes
Top