Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
March competition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 279036" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I think I understand Jonathan's point, because it bothers me some as well. Sure, moderators will either ignore or (preferably) delete entries, as Don seems to be doing, but as a photographer, if I have an idea I'm working on and then see someone post something similar, I may trash that idea and move onto something else. If the photo posted was outside the limits of the contest, I may still abandon mine because I do not want to draw comparisons or potentially be thought to have "stolen" someone else's idea. The plain truth is that someone's ignorance of the rules, willful or accidental, can impact the entries of others in the competition. Were the entries submitted by email and not revealed until included in a single gallery by the moderators this wouldn't be a problem (not that I'm suggesting this method). But as is, the presence of disqualified entries has the potential to impact future entries by another photographer.</p><p></p><p>I know, it's a friendly little forum competition, but we all want to do our best and see how our photos stack up, and when you attempt to play by the rules it can be frustrating when others ignore them. Like busting your butt to shoot <em>something</em> every day in your 365 and seeing someone post "stuff from earlier this week" in theirs - you want to point it out, for their sake and your own, but to some it always going to seem petty, because for some rules were made to be bent when nothing "important" is at stake.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 279036, member: 9240"] I think I understand Jonathan's point, because it bothers me some as well. Sure, moderators will either ignore or (preferably) delete entries, as Don seems to be doing, but as a photographer, if I have an idea I'm working on and then see someone post something similar, I may trash that idea and move onto something else. If the photo posted was outside the limits of the contest, I may still abandon mine because I do not want to draw comparisons or potentially be thought to have "stolen" someone else's idea. The plain truth is that someone's ignorance of the rules, willful or accidental, can impact the entries of others in the competition. Were the entries submitted by email and not revealed until included in a single gallery by the moderators this wouldn't be a problem (not that I'm suggesting this method). But as is, the presence of disqualified entries has the potential to impact future entries by another photographer. I know, it's a friendly little forum competition, but we all want to do our best and see how our photos stack up, and when you attempt to play by the rules it can be frustrating when others ignore them. Like busting your butt to shoot [I]something[/I] every day in your 365 and seeing someone post "stuff from earlier this week" in theirs - you want to point it out, for their sake and your own, but to some it always going to seem petty, because for some rules were made to be bent when nothing "important" is at stake. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
March competition
Top