Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Marcel's once in a while daily or weekly 2014
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 378303" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Yes, it is. When I was checking mine out at the camera store, the employee said he used to own one and used it for toddler portraits. He said the bokeh is creamier than the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8. I haven't used it enough to compare, but it produces terrific results. The only down side is no VR. </p><p></p><p>I was surprised when I looked at the back end of the lens. The employee said the rear element is <em>in front</em> of the aperture so there isn't any glass right near the back end.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 378303, member: 13196"] Yes, it is. When I was checking mine out at the camera store, the employee said he used to own one and used it for toddler portraits. He said the bokeh is creamier than the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8. I haven't used it enough to compare, but it produces terrific results. The only down side is no VR. I was surprised when I looked at the back end of the lens. The employee said the rear element is [I]in front[/I] of the aperture so there isn't any glass right near the back end. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Marcel's once in a while daily or weekly 2014
Top
