Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hyogen" data-source="post: 345095" data-attributes="member: 12676"><p>Thanks for all the advice/tips guys.&nbsp; I will check into the DXO Optics Pro also.&nbsp; My friend just got a 5D3 so I'll check it out and/or rent one.&nbsp; Money is not a huge obstacle--but I do want to give my D600 every chance it deserves.&nbsp; It obviously has a better quality sensor according to DXO Mark, but I think it translates into a better landscape camera.&nbsp; I looked into Fuji and I am impressed with skin tones, but I have also seen and read that peoples' skin starts looking waxy at higher ISOs.&nbsp; I have never looked into Fuji lenses and all, but I'm guessing it's more expensive/limited than Nikon/Canon.&nbsp; One thing I really like about Canon is that 2nd-hand lenses seem to be significantly more abundant and cheaper than Nikon lenses.&nbsp; Just for example, the venerable 135mm f/2.0 L lens can be had for $750 easy, while Nikon's quite old version is closer to $1000.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Hyogen, post: 345095, member: 12676"] Thanks for all the advice/tips guys. I will check into the DXO Optics Pro also. My friend just got a 5D3 so I'll check it out and/or rent one. Money is not a huge obstacle--but I do want to give my D600 every chance it deserves. It obviously has a better quality sensor according to DXO Mark, but I think it translates into a better landscape camera. I looked into Fuji and I am impressed with skin tones, but I have also seen and read that peoples' skin starts looking waxy at higher ISOs. I have never looked into Fuji lenses and all, but I'm guessing it's more expensive/limited than Nikon/Canon. One thing I really like about Canon is that 2nd-hand lenses seem to be significantly more abundant and cheaper than Nikon lenses. Just for example, the venerable 135mm f/2.0 L lens can be had for $750 easy, while Nikon's quite old version is closer to $1000. [/QUOTE]

Verification