Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
macro question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 442377" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>If you are measuring enlargement ratio (like 1:1), it doesn't matter if you use width, height, or diagonal... so long as you compare the same dimension on subject and image. It's just about size of image on the sensor. If a 6mm object is a 6mm image on the sensor, then that is real life size of 1:1. That would be 1:1 regardless of the size of the sensor, but unfortunately, with digital, knowing sensor size is our only measuring tool. With film, we could simply measure it on the negative on the table. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>If you are computing crop factor, diagonal perhaps has an edge if the sensor size is not 3:2 to match 35mm film. Can't really precisely compare different shapes of course, but diagonal is a good compromise. This can surely be argued either way. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>But if sensor is 3:2 (a DSLR), matching 35 mm film, then any dimension works same as any other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 442377, member: 12496"] If you are measuring enlargement ratio (like 1:1), it doesn't matter if you use width, height, or diagonal... so long as you compare the same dimension on subject and image. It's just about size of image on the sensor. If a 6mm object is a 6mm image on the sensor, then that is real life size of 1:1. That would be 1:1 regardless of the size of the sensor, but unfortunately, with digital, knowing sensor size is our only measuring tool. With film, we could simply measure it on the negative on the table. :) If you are computing crop factor, diagonal perhaps has an edge if the sensor size is not 3:2 to match 35mm film. Can't really precisely compare different shapes of course, but diagonal is a good compromise. This can surely be argued either way. :) But if sensor is 3:2 (a DSLR), matching 35 mm film, then any dimension works same as any other. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
macro question
Top