Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 474613" data-attributes="member: 15675">Change your thinking, you do not need more lenses. Btw I`m trying to get rid of NAS.Looking at your lenses:Wide angle you should be OK with the 18 mm zooms you have. Unless you are really into wide angle fast lenses.Standard you have that nifty fifty.You have some reasonable telephoto capability there.Try to do as much as you can with that 50, 300 and 600mm it should bring you far in Macro, if that is not sufficient ...As you saw people recommended about every macro lens available (they forgot the newer Samyang, not very known yet). That is since they are all very good.I have an older second hand Tamron myself and must admit I`m enjoying it. It is more needed on FX though, the rest does get you far on DX.Since you do not have fast telephoto lenses that might be an opportunity to start that, be careful it is addictive.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 474613, member: 15675"] Change your thinking, you do not need more lenses. Btw I`m trying to get rid of NAS. Looking at your lenses: Wide angle you should be OK with the 18 mm zooms you have. Unless you are really into wide angle fast lenses. Standard you have that nifty fifty. You have some reasonable telephoto capability there. Try to do as much as you can with that 50, 300 and 600mm it should bring you far in Macro, if that is not sufficient ... As you saw people recommended about every macro lens available (they forgot the newer Samyang, not very known yet). That is since they are all very good. I have an older second hand Tamron myself and must admit I`m enjoying it. It is more needed on FX though, the rest does get you far on DX. Since you do not have fast telephoto lenses that might be an opportunity to start that, be careful it is addictive. [/QUOTE]

Verification