Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Macro lens or tubes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 575109" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>One difference is that extension tubes changes the way the lens focuses. In fact, near 1:1, the lens really does not focus anymore, its focus ring has such little range and effect we'd say it no longer focuses (focus is no longer useful). Instead, we move the camera back and forth hunting for the one distance where it will focus. Which is difficult on a tripod, and is the reason that geared focusing racks are used (to move the camera back and forth). If you want it to focus at a different distance, you change the tubes appropriately. Which is Not handy. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Whereas the macro lens will simply focus at any distance, like any lens does, but of course very much closer too. Easy as pie.</p><p>We only move the camera to change the magnification of the view we see. We get used to this great convenience.</p><p></p><p>Plus the macro lens is optically corrected for the closer distance, where a regular lens is not.</p><p></p><p>You would want a pretty short extension tube for butterflies and flowers.</p><p></p><p>Butterflies and flowers may not need either one. Insects might, but we typically don't do 1:1 macro blowups, but instead are standing back a few feet. A "closeup filter" is handy for that. Basically just a magnifying glass screwed on to the front of the lens. Can be used on a zoom lens to give more telephoto versatility. It does prevent focusing at infinity then, but it will focus close. Not nearly 1:1, but at a couple of feet, just about right for flowers and butterflies. </p><p></p><p>These "closeup filters" are marked with "diopter" strength, and the meaning is 1/diopter is the maximum distance they can be used. For example, 2 diopter works at up to 1/2 meter (lens focused at infinity then, and can focus closer). </p><p></p><p>There are good ones (double elements of glass, the Canon 500D is one of the good ones, the 500 means it is 2 diopters, or 1/2 meter). And there are cheapies, not as good. These are just screwon "filters", works on any camera with a matching filter thread size.</p><p></p><p>Extension tubes and macro lenses both reduce the light at high magnification, and require longer exposure. The closeup filters do not, but they are sharper when stopped well down, like say f/11 or so.</p><p></p><p>I think most of us quickly find the macro lens to become our favorite lens. Very versatile and handy, we don't have to keep changing tubes or filters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 575109, member: 12496"] One difference is that extension tubes changes the way the lens focuses. In fact, near 1:1, the lens really does not focus anymore, its focus ring has such little range and effect we'd say it no longer focuses (focus is no longer useful). Instead, we move the camera back and forth hunting for the one distance where it will focus. Which is difficult on a tripod, and is the reason that geared focusing racks are used (to move the camera back and forth). If you want it to focus at a different distance, you change the tubes appropriately. Which is Not handy. :) Whereas the macro lens will simply focus at any distance, like any lens does, but of course very much closer too. Easy as pie. We only move the camera to change the magnification of the view we see. We get used to this great convenience. Plus the macro lens is optically corrected for the closer distance, where a regular lens is not. You would want a pretty short extension tube for butterflies and flowers. Butterflies and flowers may not need either one. Insects might, but we typically don't do 1:1 macro blowups, but instead are standing back a few feet. A "closeup filter" is handy for that. Basically just a magnifying glass screwed on to the front of the lens. Can be used on a zoom lens to give more telephoto versatility. It does prevent focusing at infinity then, but it will focus close. Not nearly 1:1, but at a couple of feet, just about right for flowers and butterflies. These "closeup filters" are marked with "diopter" strength, and the meaning is 1/diopter is the maximum distance they can be used. For example, 2 diopter works at up to 1/2 meter (lens focused at infinity then, and can focus closer). There are good ones (double elements of glass, the Canon 500D is one of the good ones, the 500 means it is 2 diopters, or 1/2 meter). And there are cheapies, not as good. These are just screwon "filters", works on any camera with a matching filter thread size. Extension tubes and macro lenses both reduce the light at high magnification, and require longer exposure. The closeup filters do not, but they are sharper when stopped well down, like say f/11 or so. I think most of us quickly find the macro lens to become our favorite lens. Very versatile and handy, we don't have to keep changing tubes or filters. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Macro lens or tubes
Top