Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brian313313" data-source="post: 351025" data-attributes="member: 11888"><p>Thanks for the replies. On further research, I agree that the 200 is not the right lens for me. I need the AF due to my eyesight and I read that the Tamron isn't as good in that area so I'll probably stick with one of the others. What I read about the 85mm Nikon was that it was a great budget lens. I want a good lens and the price difference between that and the Sigma is only about $120. It is a bigger difference between the Sigma and the Nikon 105 @ $900 but I'm familiar with Nikon lenses so that adds some comfort. The weight is a factor too though. I'm leaning towards the Sigma 105 right now but the 85 Nikon is close...still considering the 105 Nikon as well. All are within my budget so I can buy something extra as well. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="brian313313, post: 351025, member: 11888"] Thanks for the replies. On further research, I agree that the 200 is not the right lens for me. I need the AF due to my eyesight and I read that the Tamron isn't as good in that area so I'll probably stick with one of the others. What I read about the 85mm Nikon was that it was a great budget lens. I want a good lens and the price difference between that and the Sigma is only about $120. It is a bigger difference between the Sigma and the Nikon 105 @ $900 but I'm familiar with Nikon lenses so that adds some comfort. The weight is a factor too though. I'm leaning towards the Sigma 105 right now but the 85 Nikon is close...still considering the 105 Nikon as well. All are within my budget so I can buy something extra as well. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification