Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Low cost FX - my take
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 353571" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>I was chatting about this FX DX thing with my wife today. Some people like her prefer a good DX like the 7100 because it's lighter, better value for money, takes lighter cheaper fast glass oh and you get the crop factor thingy if you need it. She now has F1.8 or 2.8 glass from 10.5 - 200mm and apart from the 70-200 vrii it was all a half or third of the FX equivalents. She also has the Tamron 150-600 giving an effective 900mm!! Even cropping a D800 doesn't get close to that resolution.</p><p></p><p>The reason we discussed it was because we were out shooting and when I saw her pictures on the D7100 with Sigma 17-50 at 2.8 I seriously wondered why I bother with my D800 as they looked very, very good to me. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 353571, member: 8705"] I was chatting about this FX DX thing with my wife today. Some people like her prefer a good DX like the 7100 because it's lighter, better value for money, takes lighter cheaper fast glass oh and you get the crop factor thingy if you need it. She now has F1.8 or 2.8 glass from 10.5 - 200mm and apart from the 70-200 vrii it was all a half or third of the FX equivalents. She also has the Tamron 150-600 giving an effective 900mm!! Even cropping a D800 doesn't get close to that resolution. The reason we discussed it was because we were out shooting and when I saw her pictures on the D7100 with Sigma 17-50 at 2.8 I seriously wondered why I bother with my D800 as they looked very, very good to me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Low cost FX - my take
Top
