Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Lossless Compressed or Uncompressed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruidoso Bill" data-source="post: 590136" data-attributes="member: 753"><p>One needs to look at the use, is it for large format print or is it for the web, how much is needed for the web and everything else may be overkill, I shoot the bodies I use more for the life expectancy and reliability, super resolution is sometimes a waste, how many thousand images do you guys take in a week and does that really need the highest resolution possible? Why do the manufacturers have built in capabilities to use lower settings when the highest is not needed or not required. I shoot thousands of images a week, have already worn out one D810, my D800 is a trusty backup and probably have have over 100K on my latest D810. I was always happy with the image quality of my D700's, so 12 bit lossless compressed is fine for my work. Pixel peepers and folks not shooting in the real world need to examine what is really required. Folks that think their images are better at the highest resolution are foolish to think that higher is always superior, it's more to do with what is required for the job and achieving the desired (customer) results, poor technique will never be aided by higher performance cameras, quite the opposite, poor technique is often amplified.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruidoso Bill, post: 590136, member: 753"] One needs to look at the use, is it for large format print or is it for the web, how much is needed for the web and everything else may be overkill, I shoot the bodies I use more for the life expectancy and reliability, super resolution is sometimes a waste, how many thousand images do you guys take in a week and does that really need the highest resolution possible? Why do the manufacturers have built in capabilities to use lower settings when the highest is not needed or not required. I shoot thousands of images a week, have already worn out one D810, my D800 is a trusty backup and probably have have over 100K on my latest D810. I was always happy with the image quality of my D700's, so 12 bit lossless compressed is fine for my work. Pixel peepers and folks not shooting in the real world need to examine what is really required. Folks that think their images are better at the highest resolution are foolish to think that higher is always superior, it's more to do with what is required for the job and achieving the desired (customer) results, poor technique will never be aided by higher performance cameras, quite the opposite, poor technique is often amplified. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Lossless Compressed or Uncompressed
Top