Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 295767" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>iso 3200 with the D7000? its going to be a different level for you when you move to FX. much more detail. less chroma noise. dynamic range. first time I used an fx camera last year and I said, whats the big fuss about. DX is fine. my friend gave me his D3 camera to use in the first wedding I shot after being out of the wedding area for many years. it was a different level altogether. I found DX very flat to my eyes. that sony sensor is something else. I was looking to get another DX camera and he basically threatened me that I dont dare buy DX. and after using the D3 I basically wanted to throw my DX camera in the garbage. this is just me personally. what I felt after using FX. I was quite shocked from the way images looked in FX that in weddings I never even took my DX camera out. not even a single shot. my transition wasnt so bad. mainly had to sell the 17-55 AFS and the camera.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 295767, member: 14443"] iso 3200 with the D7000? its going to be a different level for you when you move to FX. much more detail. less chroma noise. dynamic range. first time I used an fx camera last year and I said, whats the big fuss about. DX is fine. my friend gave me his D3 camera to use in the first wedding I shot after being out of the wedding area for many years. it was a different level altogether. I found DX very flat to my eyes. that sony sensor is something else. I was looking to get another DX camera and he basically threatened me that I dont dare buy DX. and after using the D3 I basically wanted to throw my DX camera in the garbage. this is just me personally. what I felt after using FX. I was quite shocked from the way images looked in FX that in weddings I never even took my DX camera out. not even a single shot. my transition wasnt so bad. mainly had to sell the 17-55 AFS and the camera. [/QUOTE]

Verification