Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
looking to try FX , but which body
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 295741" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>Unless you are doing a lot of wild life and need the reach offered by the telephotos on the DX sensor; in my opinion; a D610 is a better buy than a D7100. (At least in India they are within 10% of each other). What you get with FX is wider FOV and slightly better low light capability. What you loose is the "apparent" reach of long telephotos.</p><p></p><p>One place where the DX trumps over FX of same MP is when the image fills in less than the area covered by DX sensor. For small images; as in case of mild macros and most wild life taken at a long distance; the higher density DX sensor will have more pixels in the image.</p><p></p><p>Again D7100 has more AF points, which are spread evenly across the image area, while the D610 has a fewer points and they are clumped together. So D7100 makes more sense if you use AF right upto the corners. In my case I am mostly limited to the centre, hence number and the spread of AF points is not that important.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 295741, member: 16090"] Unless you are doing a lot of wild life and need the reach offered by the telephotos on the DX sensor; in my opinion; a D610 is a better buy than a D7100. (At least in India they are within 10% of each other). What you get with FX is wider FOV and slightly better low light capability. What you loose is the "apparent" reach of long telephotos. One place where the DX trumps over FX of same MP is when the image fills in less than the area covered by DX sensor. For small images; as in case of mild macros and most wild life taken at a long distance; the higher density DX sensor will have more pixels in the image. Again D7100 has more AF points, which are spread evenly across the image area, while the D610 has a fewer points and they are clumped together. So D7100 makes more sense if you use AF right upto the corners. In my case I am mostly limited to the centre, hence number and the spread of AF points is not that important. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
looking to try FX , but which body
Top