Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fotojack" data-source="post: 29626" data-attributes="member: 16">LOL....Canadian shutter clicks! LOL Too funny. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Yeah, everything's metric here, eh. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Actually, Joe, they tend to be on the conservative side when doing these tests. Even though they're tested to 100k clicks, I'd be pretty surprised if they didn't surpass that number by a wide margin. And yes, on the higher end models, the 150k number is also a conservative number. I personally know a pro photographer that has well over 200k on his D200...and it's still going strong! Quite impressive, I must say. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="fotojack, post: 29626, member: 16"] LOL....Canadian shutter clicks! LOL Too funny. :) Yeah, everything's metric here, eh. :) Actually, Joe, they tend to be on the conservative side when doing these tests. Even though they're tested to 100k clicks, I'd be pretty surprised if they didn't surpass that number by a wide margin. And yes, on the higher end models, the 150k number is also a conservative number. I personally know a pro photographer that has well over 200k on his D200...and it's still going strong! Quite impressive, I must say. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification