Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BF Hammer" data-source="post: 826152" data-attributes="member: 48483">Of these I only have the 24-70mm f/4. Generally speaking, image quality is a compromise as you increase the zoom range on a lens. I remember watching a video by Thomas Heaton when he switched back to Nikon with a Z7II. He sampled the Z24-70 f/4, Z24-120 f/4 and Z24-200. No surprise, he preferred the 24-70. But the 24-120mm was nearly as good in his opinion.I did get a F-mount 24-120mm f/4 as a kit with my D750. No significant complaints with it but it is kind of chunky in the hand. The lens stores fairly compact as it is short at minimum zoom.When I have unlimited funds in a parallel universe, I would have a 2nd Z camera, a 24-70mm f/2.8 s-line, and the 24-120mm f/4 as a 2nd option. But in this world I am very good with my 24-70mm f/4 and an F-mount 70-200mm f/2.8G VR which I picked up used just weeks before buying my Z5. It will eventually be exchanged for a Z version, it's a low financial priority.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BF Hammer, post: 826152, member: 48483"] Of these I only have the 24-70mm f/4. Generally speaking, image quality is a compromise as you increase the zoom range on a lens. I remember watching a video by Thomas Heaton when he switched back to Nikon with a Z7II. He sampled the Z24-70 f/4, Z24-120 f/4 and Z24-200. No surprise, he preferred the 24-70. But the 24-120mm was nearly as good in his opinion. I did get a F-mount 24-120mm f/4 as a kit with my D750. No significant complaints with it but it is kind of chunky in the hand. The lens stores fairly compact as it is short at minimum zoom. When I have unlimited funds in a parallel universe, I would have a 2nd Z camera, a 24-70mm f/2.8 s-line, and the 24-120mm f/4 as a 2nd option. But in this world I am very good with my 24-70mm f/4 and an F-mount 70-200mm f/2.8G VR which I picked up used just weeks before buying my Z5. It will eventually be exchanged for a Z version, it's a low financial priority. [/QUOTE]

Verification